Police Oracle Forum is the leading UK police discussion group where you can ask questions to real police officers. The forum is a community website which encourages both police officers as well as civilian members to take part in the different police discussion topics brought up.
You can find information on police careers, crime statistics, UK laws, traffic policing and related laws and regulations, drugs info, in fact hundreds of pages of information related to police, law and crime in the UK and beyond.
|
|
Police Forum
Police Forum |
This is an XML content feed of; Police Forum : Last 10 Posts |
|
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: Whisper
Subject: Help - Conducting interviews
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 10:20pm
Originally posted by Phil McCracken And lastly, the purpose of the interview is to seek the truth, not to stick it to the suspect.
Ahhhhhhh..............................
|
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: tonkatoy
Subject: Exploding Public Sector Pensions Myths
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 9:44pm
See the submission to the public sector pension commision from the Fed. |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: dangermouse
Subject: Help - Conducting interviews
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 9:24pm
Originally posted by Phil McCrackenAs a tier 3 interviewer I feel quite well placed to answer this one. And lastly, the purpose of the interview is to seek the truth, not to stick it to the suspect. |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: Shuck
Subject: HMG Need Help
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:55pm
CPS= Couldn't Prosecute Satan. How about promoting people because of their ability to do the job, as opposed promoting them beyond their ability to do the job? Get rid of Safer Neighbourhood Teams, Response Teams, Priority Crime Teams, Major Crime Teams, etc etc, and return to a system called the 'A shift'. Each shift could have a Sergeant, and have beat officers, panda drivers and area car drivers. High value crimes, serious assaults etc could be investigated by something that is called CID. Perhaps the idea of 'keep it simple' might work, again. |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: Backlash
Subject: SPP RIP
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:42pm
Originally posted by tee5
Now this- I might have to break with tradition and start taking time off sick with the rest of em.
I agree. I cannot abide sickies. I haven't had a day off sick since I joined in the late 80's... |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: bunrotha
Subject: Insurance 'fronting'
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:41pm
BlueScorpio3, spot on, that's my understanding too. looking at s143(1), I see some words to support this: a person must not use a motor vehicle on a road unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that person such a policy of insurance... If the insurer takes the position that "Had we known that, we'd never have taken you on cover," they void from inception, which means the policy is not in force, and thanks to contractual wording, never was, causing an offence under s143 without affecting liability to third parties under s151. Of course, I'm open to correction on that too! The article 75 stuff acts to cover claims by third parties against uninsured drivers, which I can understand, since in theory the third party didn't do anything wrong. It doesn't provide s143(1) insurance, so I agree a contravention is likely for policies voided from inception. I do see a pizza-shaped loophole though- s143(3), where using a car for work, that isn't their own car, and playing dumb on insurance, assuming there is cover, may work as a defence. I'd like to believe that unscrupulous pizza house owners never do that in the real world, but I suspect I'm being hopelessly naive there. If there is an accident, the determination of liability for RTC injury claims under £10,000 has to be done in 14 days (I never thought I'd say it, but thank you MoJ) so you may find a very good indicator of an s143(1) offence pops up quite quickly. The ACPO-ABI MoU and DPA Section 29 disclosures are your friend! Goes without saying, best of luck getting enough truth to sort it all out at the roadside. I don't envy you there.
Edited by bunrotha - Today at 8:43pm |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: Penbwlch
Subject: 5 word story
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:35pm
star, the No5 dog would
|
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: tee5
Subject: SPP RIP
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:20pm
Back to SPP- West Mids have announced that this years SPP will be halved. They've got rid of Always There, which was nice if you never had time off. Now this- I might have to break with tradition and start taking time off sick with the rest of em. |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: 999tommo
Subject: Question about Cars and Caravans
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:19pm
Originally posted by LoudLee
Nearly forgot (to clarify) , the grandfather rights come from date of test passed, ie first licence issued. Not the date of issue on the one youve currently got. I finally changed from a pink paper licence to photo, issued March 10 and it still has the B&E amongst others on it.
Ive seen that point debated on the caravan forums with exactly that point causing problems
I accept that one. I did mean a licence FIRST ISSUED before 1998, not renewals etc. |
| |
|
30/07/2010 |
Author: Brutus
Subject: Embarrassed!
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 8:17pm
Whisper
"We had a lot of house alterations last year, the main builder was a fella called John. He is 75, been in the game for 60 years"
Gosh! Any earlier and he would have been helping out with the pyramids!
Brutus
|
| |
|
|
|
